Charlottesville, part 2

Yesterday I wrote about how, figuratively speaking, our nation has always had a crack in our liberty bell.  Today I feel the need to discuss something that is rampant in today’s news, a growing tendency that is harmful rather than helpful.  That is the proliferation of the label “hate groups.”

If you’re wondering what you can do to help stem the tide of racism and violence, one step we can all take is to stop referring to people as “hate groups”—not because it’s inaccurate, but because it’s too easy.  It keeps us from engaging in discussion about underlying issues.  The KKK and its offspring are certainly hate groups, but specifically they are racist groups.  To merely say they’re a hate group is to dismiss them as bad guys; to say they’re a racist group gives us an opportunity to say why their views are wrong and discuss ways we can keep from being infected by them.  I am not arguing that the label “hate group” is always misapplied, but rather that it is insufficient.

It’s not just hate groups.  What about “hate speech”?  What is that?  Communication is impossible if we don’t define our terms.  What is hate?  What is a hate group?  Is this really the best way to categorize them?  It seems to happen way too frequently that one person says or writes something that another person disagrees with, so it’s condescendingly labeled “hate speech,” as though that necessarily means that the accuser triumphs over the hater.  It short-circuits the conversation.  When we call others “hate groups,” we deceive ourselves into thinking that’s the end of the conversation.  It’s not.  White supremacy—or any-race-supremacy—is hateful, but why?  That’s what we need to talk about.

We all belong to groups that others consider a hate group.  Whether you’re conservative or liberal, a God-worshiper or atheist, American or another nationality—someone considers you part of a hate group.  As a Bible-believing Christian, millions of people would say I belong to a hate group (a gross misrepresentation, since our founder explicitly insisted that we be known by our love).  But as a Bible-believing Christian, I don’t hate anybody.  So why am I perceived that way?  Because of the group label being carelessly thrown around.  The protesters and counter-protesters in Charlottesville both probably considered the other side a hate group.  (I’m not saying that both groups were hate groups, but that they both likely perceived their opposition that way.)  That shows how unhelpful the term is because it’s woefully imprecise.  This is how wars start: demonize the other side by dehumanizing them with a label.  And a war of some kind is indeed what seems to be brewing in this country.

Referring to certain groups merely as “hate groups” lets them off too easily—and it lets us off too easily.  I can feel good about myself because I’m not part of a “hate group”; I’m a white guy who doesn’t belong to the KKK, has black friends, and doesn’t judge people by the color of their skin.  The haters are those other people, and I don’t belong to their group.  But what about me as an individual?  Do I speak about people with political differences in denigrating terms which suggest they’re less than human?  Do I avoid eye contact with the homeless guy on the street?  Do I give the waitress a bad tip because the cook messed up my order?  Do I carry a grudge against a sibling or former friend because of something that happened years ago?  Do I avoid uncomfortable situations in which I could help people, rather than seeking out these opportunities?  Do I pretend I don’t see people and their needs all around me?  If I’m doing any of these things, who is the hater?  Am I off the hook simply because I don’t have an official membership in a club?

I went to the website of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is known—or so I thought—for tracking hate groups.  They even do a good job of defining hate crime as crimes where bias is the primary motive for committing the crime.  So I was quite surprised to see that, according to their own website, they blatantly exercise bias in determining what a hate group is; on their “Hatewatch” site, it says at the very top: “Hatewatch monitors and exposes the activities of the American radical right.”  Hold up—what?!?  Then who’s keeping tabs on the activities of the American radical left?  What about the middle?  Does this mean that if hate groups have a liberal perspective, then they’re not hate groups?  This is one extreme, yet very prominent, example of how the term “hate” is manipulated for political purposes.  It is used to bring division rather than unity.  This is not to pick on liberals, but to emphasize that hatred does not belong to either the right or the left.  It’s epidemic on both sides.  Hatred is not a political leaning, but a sickness of the heart that is manifested in harmful ideologies and expressed in violence and oppression.

Pointing fingers at other people and calling them haters is easy and harmful.  Pointing our evaluative eye inward and choosing to love others is much more difficult, but is ultimately helpful.  Instead of wasting our time accusing others of hate, let’s devote our energies to making sure that we can be rightfully accused of love.

Advertisements
Published in: on August 15, 2017 at 12:39 pm  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://nathanhyde.com/2017/08/15/charlottesville-part-2/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: